
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BAWSCA &#187; Don Pedro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bawsca.org/tag/don-pedro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bawsca.org</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:59:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>HETCH HETCHY RESERVOIR &#8211; To drain or not to drain &#8211; Next months key in debate on state&#8217;s epic environmental issue</title>
		<link>http://bawsca.org/hetch-hetchy-reservoir-to-drain-or-not-to-drain-next-months-key-in-debate-on-states-epic-environmental-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://bawsca.org/hetch-hetchy-reservoir-to-drain-or-not-to-drain-next-months-key-in-debate-on-states-epic-environmental-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Department of Water Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Pedro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hetch Hetchy Reservoir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hetch Hetchy Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modesto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O'Shaughnessy Dam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco chronicle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco Public Utilities Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SFPUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turlock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bawsca.org/?p=408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glen Martin, Chronicle Environment Writer Monday, June 13, 2005 The debate over the proposal to breach the Sierra&#8217;s O&#8217;Shaughnessy Dam, drain the reservoir behind it and restore Hetch Hetchy Valley to its former natural splendor is apt to intensify this summer with the release of a California Department of Water Resources study on the issue. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://bawsca.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/SanFranciscoChronicle.jpg" alt="" title="SanFranciscoChronicle" width="300" height="50" /></p>
<h3>Glen Martin, Chronicle Environment Writer<br />
Monday, June 13, 2005</h3>
<p>The debate over the proposal to breach the Sierra&#8217;s O&#8217;Shaughnessy Dam, drain the reservoir behind it and restore Hetch Hetchy<br />
Valley to its former natural splendor is apt to intensify this summer with the release of a California Department of Water Resources study on the issue.  </p>
<p>But preliminary comments from the agency indicate two things:  </p>
<p>First, the restoration is technically possible without disrupting water supplies to San<br />
Francisco, Modesto and Turlock, the cities that are the beneficiaries of Hetch Hetchy water.  </p>
<p>Second, it will cost a lot of money: From $4 billion to $8 billion, depending on whom you<br />
talk to.</p>
<p>Read more at the <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/06/13/BAGIOD7JHK1.DTL" target="_blank">San Francisco Chronicle</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bawsca.org/hetch-hetchy-reservoir-to-drain-or-not-to-drain-next-months-key-in-debate-on-states-epic-environmental-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
