
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BAWSCA &#187; San Francisco</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bawsca.org/tag/san-francisco/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bawsca.org</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:59:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>HETCH HETCHY RESERVOIR &#8211; To drain or not to drain &#8211; Next months key in debate on state&#8217;s epic environmental issue</title>
		<link>http://bawsca.org/hetch-hetchy-reservoir-to-drain-or-not-to-drain-next-months-key-in-debate-on-states-epic-environmental-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://bawsca.org/hetch-hetchy-reservoir-to-drain-or-not-to-drain-next-months-key-in-debate-on-states-epic-environmental-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Department of Water Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Pedro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hetch Hetchy Reservoir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hetch Hetchy Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modesto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O'Shaughnessy Dam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco chronicle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco Public Utilities Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SFPUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turlock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bawsca.org/?p=408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glen Martin, Chronicle Environment Writer Monday, June 13, 2005 The debate over the proposal to breach the Sierra&#8217;s O&#8217;Shaughnessy Dam, drain the reservoir behind it and restore Hetch Hetchy Valley to its former natural splendor is apt to intensify this summer with the release of a California Department of Water Resources study on the issue. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://bawsca.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/SanFranciscoChronicle.jpg" alt="" title="SanFranciscoChronicle" width="300" height="50" /></p>
<h3>Glen Martin, Chronicle Environment Writer<br />
Monday, June 13, 2005</h3>
<p>The debate over the proposal to breach the Sierra&#8217;s O&#8217;Shaughnessy Dam, drain the reservoir behind it and restore Hetch Hetchy<br />
Valley to its former natural splendor is apt to intensify this summer with the release of a California Department of Water Resources study on the issue.  </p>
<p>But preliminary comments from the agency indicate two things:  </p>
<p>First, the restoration is technically possible without disrupting water supplies to San<br />
Francisco, Modesto and Turlock, the cities that are the beneficiaries of Hetch Hetchy water.  </p>
<p>Second, it will cost a lot of money: From $4 billion to $8 billion, depending on whom you<br />
talk to.</p>
<p>Read more at the <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/06/13/BAGIOD7JHK1.DTL" target="_blank">San Francisco Chronicle</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bawsca.org/hetch-hetchy-reservoir-to-drain-or-not-to-drain-next-months-key-in-debate-on-states-epic-environmental-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hetch Hetchy costs to get review</title>
		<link>http://bawsca.org/hetch-hetchy-costs-to-get-review/</link>
		<comments>http://bawsca.org/hetch-hetchy-costs-to-get-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 08:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hetch hetchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hetch Hetchy Water System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco Public Utilities Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bawsca.org/?p=418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wednesday, March 23, 2005 By Edward Carpenter Daily News Staff Writer Independent auditors will be hired to double-check San Francisco Public Utilities Commission calculations regarding the increasing costs of the Hetch Hetchy Water System overhaul, Bay Area water officials said yesterday. &#8220;I do have some questions,&#8221; said Art Jensen, general manager of the Bay Area [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://bawsca.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/TheDailyNews.jpg" alt="" title="TheDailyNews" width="300" height="50" /></p>
<h3>Wednesday, March 23, 2005<br />
By Edward Carpenter<br />
Daily News Staff Writer</h3>
<p>Independent auditors will be hired to double-check San Francisco Public Utilities Commission calculations regarding the increasing costs of the Hetch Hetchy Water System overhaul, Bay Area water officials said yesterday.</p>
<p>&#8220;I do have some questions,&#8221; said Art Jensen, general manager of the Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency. &#8220;I&#8217;m going to have two outside experts review it.&#8221; The agency represents 28 Bay Area governments and water districts outside San Francisco, including San Mateo County. The 80-year-old system, which delivers water to about 2.5 million Bay Area residents from near Yosemite, is vulnerable to earthquakes and could leave the region without water for as long as 60 days if were to break, officials have said.</p>
<p>Jensen said that input from the auditors would help convince him that the methodology, factors and costs of the utility commission proposal are sound or that there are questions that need to be explored further.</p>
<p>The announcement that the Conservation Agency will hire the two auditors comes the same day that the commission released the most detailed breakdown yet of the nearly $1 billion in additional costs announced Feb. 8, raising the total cost from about $3.6 billion to more than $4.3 billion.</p>
<p>As reported in the Daily News Monday, Jensen, along with Conservation Agency board members, have continued to take the utilities commission&#8211;the agency heading up the Hetch Hetchy Water System rebuild&#8211;to task for its lack of clarity and openness regarding the cost and time it will take to complete the project. The utilities commission took a major step in trying to assuage critics yesterday by voting to raise San Francisco water rates by 15 percent both in the current year and coming year to help pay off the bond debt for the rebuild.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s us honoring our commitment to step forward and issue the bonds for the rebuild,&#8221; said Tony Winnicker, commission spokesman, describing the vote.</p>
<p>San Francisco residents, on average, will pay about $1.10 more per month for water under the new rates, officials said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bawsca.org/hetch-hetchy-costs-to-get-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
